Recently, with top legal cases at Harvard and many other top colleges, Affirmative Action and race-based admissions policies are being question on their use and if they should be allowed to continue. So what is Affirmative Action and race-based admissions?

Affirmative action in college admissions refers to policies and practices that seek to increase the representation of historically underrepresented minority groups, such as Black, Hispanic, and Native American students, in colleges and universities. The goal of affirmative action is to promote diversity on college campuses and provide opportunities for underrepresented minority groups to gain access to higher education.

Affirmative action can take many different forms in college admissions, including the use of race and ethnicity as a factor in admission decisions, outreach and recruitment efforts targeted at underrepresented minority groups, and the use of alternative admissions criteria to assess applicants' potential for success.

The use of race as a factor in college admissions has been a topic of debate and controversy for many years, with some arguing that it is necessary to promote diversity and address past discrimination, while others argue that it is unfair and violates the principle of merit-based admissions. Despite the controversy, affirmative action remains a common practice in college admissions in the United States, although the specifics of how it is implemented can vary by institution and state.

Race-based college admissions policies, also known as affirmative action, have been a topic of debate and controversy for many years. Here are some of the pros and cons of race-based college admissions policies:

Pros:

1. Promoting diversity: One of the main arguments in favor of race-based college admissions policies is that they promote diversity on college campuses, which can lead to a richer and more inclusive educational experience for all students.

2. Addressing past discrimination: Supporters argue that race-based college admissions policies can help to address past discrimination and provide opportunities for underrepresented minority groups to gain access to higher education.

3. Fostering social mobility: By providing opportunities for students from underrepresented minority groups to attend college, race-based college admissions policies can help to foster social mobility and reduce economic inequality.

Cons:

1. Reverse discrimination: One of the main arguments against race-based college admissions policies is that they can result in reverse discrimination, where more qualified applicants from non-minority groups are passed over in favor of less qualified applicants from underrepresented minority groups.

2. Stereotyping: Critics argue that race-based college admissions policies can reinforce negative stereotypes about certain racial and ethnic groups and perpetuate inequality.

3. Fairness: Opponents of race-based college admissions policies argue that they are unfair and violate the principle of merit-based admissions, where admission decisions are based solely on academic and personal achievements.

It's important to note that the debate over race-based college admissions policies is complex and multifaceted, with many arguments and counterarguments on both sides. Ultimately, it's up to each individual to evaluate the arguments and come to their own conclusion on this issue.